You may recall from last year I made posts about Jamie Maussan and his presentation of non-human bodies. The objects in question, which were purportedly from Peru, saw much scrutiny and at the end of the day was determined to be a hoax. Following the Mexican Congressional conference where the objects were showcased, the Peruvian Ministry of Culture launched a criminal investigation into how Maussan acquired the objects and how he got them out of the country.
This all happened around September of 2023. Well, in October two more ‘alien mummies’ were found in Lima’s airport by a DHL currier. According to the Independent the objects where intended for “illicit” transport to Mexico.
Was proof of alien life on display at the Mexican Chamber of Deputies the other week, or is it a hoax?
A few weeks ago, many were intrigued, a few concerned, but most made humorously skeptical about two purportedly non-human mummies that were displayed before the Mexican Chamber of Deputies (which is their equivalent to the US House of Representatives). If you have not heard, here is a recap. Jamie Maussan journalist and UFO enthusiast, who has made some outlandish and false stunts before the September 12 Mexico hearing presented two figures approximately 60cm long having 3 fingers and toes on each limb respectively and oddly shaped heads.[i] At some point in 2015 there seems to have been a special broadcast on Gaia that included mummified human remains which were touted as being alien.[ii] This particular special included Mr. Maussan and Dr. Benitez. Unfortunately, the remains were of a mummified human child.[iii] Furthermore, Mr. Maussan claims that in 2017 he had the Autonomous National University of Mexico test some samples of the current batch of non-humans and that they found them to be around 1000 years old and were not human. [iv] This is partly false. The National Autonomous University of Mexico responded then (June 2017) as it has again (September 2023) that they did carbon 14 dating that year (June 2017) and that they did not nor do they test for the origin of the sample or come into contact with the original sample source.[v]
Seemingly party to Mr. Maussan’s activities is Dr. Jose de Jesus Zalce Benitez Director of the Scientific Institute for Health for the Mexican Navy, who was present in 2015, has stated that these are non-human remains. On Monday, September 18, 2023, he conducted tests including x-rays and CT scans and determined that the bodies were not manufactured, and all the bones came from the same organism. [vi], [vii], [viii]. “These bodies have no relation to human beings.” [ix]
According to many news outlets (you can google it yourself), say that scientists scoff at this stunt. Physics Professor Brian Cox thinks the specimen look too human stating: “It’s very unlikely that an intelligent species that evolved on another planet would look like us.” He also challenged a sample being sent to 23&me or another institute for independent verification.[x] Speaking of verification the Twitter account @gchavez101 has defended Mr. Maussan and Dr. Benitez posting links to three DNA studies, presumably pertaining to the specimens in question.[xi] The studies which were published a few weeks apart in July/August 2022 show the breakdown of DNA. The unidentifiable DNA in the samples are thus: Ancient0002 27.93%, Ancient 0003 2.62%, and Ancient 004 63.72%. However, unless I am missing something all three come back as Homo sapien. [xii], [xiii], [xiv]
What is new? Mr. Maussan may be under a criminal investigation as Leslie Carol Urteaga Peña of the Peruvian Ministry of Culture has filed a criminal complaint against Mr. Maussan as to how exactly he got the specimen, which are perceived to possibly be pre-Hispanic artifacts, out of Peru. Mr. Maussan clams he has done nothing wrong and will disclose that information in due time.[xv] This however is being met by Mr. Maussan with a suit for defamation against the Peruvian Ministry of Culture. It is his position that the people who brought the specimens out of Peru have all the legal documentation.[xvi]
Are the mummies proof of extraterrestrials? It is unclear at this point. Looking at pictures of the 2015 child mummy and the specimens show in Mexico, they do not look anything a like to me. The 2015 mummy is clearly human. The only avenue for a hoax is the specimen has been cobbled together from other animals, but Dr. Benitez is adamant it is not. Hopefully this will go to court and we can get some real answers.
A previously classified memo has surfaced in Canada. Originally obtained by CTV News through a freedom of information request, this document tells a story that many of us may have forgotten since February. Let’s recap. 3 UAP were shot down: Feb 10 Alaska, Feb 11 Yukon Territory Canada, Feb 12 Lake Huron.
Alaska was shot down by an F22 from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. The pilots gave conflicting reports about the appearance, but one stated it possibly interferes with the plane’s controls. It was the size of a small car but was never classified as a balloon and remains a UAP. Significant amounts of debris were recovered.[1]
Yukon was shot down by an F22 also from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. Possibly cylindrical in shape. It was never classified as a balloon and remains a UAP. It is unclear if it was recovered by Canadian Forces or not.[2]
Lake Huron was shot down by an F-16 from the Wisconsin National Guard. The object was possibly octagonal in shape and much smaller than the Chinese spy balloon. It was never classified as a balloon and remains a UAP. It is unclear if anything was recovered.[3]
We have three different articles the first two floating the idea that China may be blamed for UAPs, and the third illustrating the possible dangers posed to air traffic.
Starting off are articles from the Daily Mail and The Mirror, both UK publications. Both are dated 8/27/23. The articles are nearly identical and outline concerns from Dr. Thomas Zurbuchen Nasa Administrator who is not ready to rule out the fact that the UAP may be of man-made origin, possibly Chinese. The articles go on to pose the balloon from February 2023 is one example of Chinese technology violating our air space. On a tangent I want to bring up that there were possibly several balloons, but not all of the UAPs we shot down were actually labeled balloons, and to my knowledge the wreckage is still out there in the wilderness.
Moving on to the third article from the Debrief dated 8/29/23 and entitled Pilot UFO Sightings Collected by NASA Reveal Serious Safety Concerns Over Objects in U.S. Airspace.
The Debrief recounts several reports made to NASA’s Aviation Safety Reporting System. The first was from April 2023 where the object had both visual and radar contact in a Class A airspace, and the object was not transposing, which in that class of airspace is illegal. Another in February 2023 was observed by multiple planes. A third from May 2022 caused the pilot to take evasive action to avoid a collision, and even though he came close enough to have a decent look he was unable to identify the object.
So what can we take away? These objects, whatever they are, do seem to pose an active threat to air traffic, and that they are seemingly common. Is it balloons, UAVs, or advanced technology from a hostile nation, we do not know.
Paranormal Operator 